Governed AI for Regulated Professionals

The governance layer between AI tools and your professional obligations.

Prove how every AI-assisted output was reviewed and approved.

For professionals like:

The governance gap in practice

0%
use AI at work
0%
maintain audit logs
0%
use unauthorised AI

* Sources and methodology

AI governance failures in court

2,100

Documented court cases involving AI-fabricated content since 2023, with 231% growth in the last 12 months.

Cases recorded from October 2025 to September 2026, compared with the previous 12 months.

See the full tracker and methodology

Chart showing quarterly case counts

Source

Every case started the same way: someone used AI without a governed process.

Check your exposure Explore Ecsper Risk Intelligence

The governance gap

Three obligations every regulated professional carries

Compliance

Rules, policies, training. Most firms have this.

Assurance

Evidence the rules are followed. Fewer firms have this for AI.

Governance

Defensible, auditable evidence that every AI-assisted decision was reviewed and approved. This is what is now expected.

Who is already asking

AI adoption is accelerating. The demand for transparency is following.

As AI becomes embedded in professional workflows, the organisations that regulate, insure, and instruct your firm are asking a new question: how do you govern it? The answer is no longer optional.

Regulators

Expect governance over every tool that touches professional work.

Insurers

Are asking how your firm governs AI before writing the policy.

Clients

Want evidence that their data is protected and your AI use is defensible.

The question is not whether this affects your practice. It is whether you know where you stand today.

The wider risk landscape

Prompt injection

Can hidden instructions influence your AI?

AI disclosure

Can you account for prompts, sources and review?

Regulatory change

Which requirements apply to your practice?

Professional sanctions

How is professional output checked and approved?

See how Ecsper addresses these risks
THE SOLUTION

Ecsper automates governance to make AI-assisted output defensible.

ADVISORY

Know where you stand

Get a clear picture of your AI risk and a plan to fix it, without disrupting your practice.

See our advisory services
PLATFORM

Prove every decision

Show the tribunal exactly how every AI-assisted output was reviewed and approved.

See our Platform
Trust

Built for the duty of confidentiality

Every capability inherits sovereign data, automated compliance, and a defensible record. Verify everything.

Technology Foundation

Five pillars. Every product.

Sovereign data, governed workspace, automated compliance, tribunal-grade AI, and a defensible record.

Standards and Compliance

ISO 27001. SOC 2. EU AI Act.

Certification roadmap, data protection, and regulatory compliance. Verified by independent auditors.

Trust Centre

Verify, do not trust.

Live compliance status, certification evidence, data processing details, and downloadable policies.

Visit the Trust Centre
OUR TEAM

Built with arbitrators, dispute lawyers, and the practitioners who rely on expert evidence every day.

Peyman Mahan Founder & CEO
Peyman Mahan

Former Head of Digital Innovation at GSK and EY; expert in regulated AI transformation.

Mo Mahan Co-Founder & COO
Mo Mahan

MRICS, FCIArb, Expert witness at leading global firms including Kroll and WSP.

Poupak Anjomshoaa Board Advisor
Poupak Anjomshoaa

Barrister and Partner at a Top 25 City law firm. Best Lawyers and Lawdragon 500 recognised.

David Barry Board Advisor
David Barry

Executive Chairman, Martello Expert Services. SCL Delay Protocol co-author. Who's Who Legal Expert of the Year.

Seamus O'Doherty Board Advisor
Seamus O'Doherty

Senior Partner (Quantum), Forensx Holdings. FRICS, FCIArb. 30+ years in construction disputes and quantum analysis.

Matt Molloy Board Advisor
Matt Molloy

Managing Director, MCMS. Adjudicator, arbitrator, and mediator in 900+ disputes. CIC ADR Board Chair.

Alain Farhad Board Advisor
Alain Farhad

Independent international arbitrator. Sole, co-, or presiding arbitrator in 100+ proceedings. Founder, Farhad Arbitration.

See how Ecsper governs your practice

Book a 30-minute session to see how Ecsper helps your practice. Or check your exposure first.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is AI governance for regulated professionals?

AI governance is the system of controls, records, and processes that ensures every AI-assisted output in professional work is reviewed, approved, and auditable. For regulated professionals such as expert witnesses, dispute lawyers, and arbitrators, governance is the bridge between using AI tools and meeting professional obligations around accuracy, confidentiality, and disclosure.

Why are courts asking about AI governance?

Courts have documented 2,100 cases where AI-fabricated content entered professional work without adequate oversight. Judges are now ordering disclosure of AI prompts and session logs. Professional sanctions have been issued in 163 cases. The question is no longer whether AI is used, but whether its use is governed.

What does Ecsper do?

Ecsper provides the governance layer between AI tools and professional obligations. The platform automates the evidence trail: which AI tool was used, what it produced, how the output was reviewed, and who approved it. This creates the defensible record that regulators, courts, and clients now expect.

How long does the AI governance assessment take?

The Check Your Exposure assessment takes under five minutes. It asks ten questions about your firm's AI governance across seven dimensions: tool visibility, use rules, supervision, records, verification, confidentiality, and transparency. Your score is shown immediately, with sector-specific regulatory context and a recommended next step.

Who needs AI governance?

Any regulated professional who uses AI tools in client work. This includes expert witnesses preparing reports, dispute lawyers conducting research, arbitrators reviewing submissions, construction consultants producing valuations, and any professional whose work product may be challenged, audited, or disclosed in proceedings.

Last updated: 12 October 2026